Position Bleacher Report in leader of new content model in Ad Age





The 'Craigslist Effect' Spreads to Content as Free Work Fills Supply

Pro-bono Writing Trumps Pro-am, Helping Websites Such as Huffington Post, Bleacher Report Turn a Profit

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- After Andrew Brining took the bar exam two years ago, he had plenty of time on his hands, and he made a habit of perusing sports news online as he awaited the results. The 31-year-old San Francisco Giants fan, however, found the predictably captious nature of sports coverage frustrating. "It's perversely counterintuitive," he said. "You're interested in this to be entertained, right?"

On the hunt for more positive fare he stumbled onto BleacherReport.com, where anybody can apply to post an original sports article. So he contributed a post. Then another. And another. In the past two years, Mr. Brining has written more than 500 articles for Bleacher, a prolific output that is more stunning for another fact: He wrote them all for free.

Sports-news website BleacherReport.com boasts more than 3,600  unpaid authors.
Sports-news website BleacherReport.com boasts more than 3,600 unpaid authors.
He is one of more than 3,600 Bleacher authors who willingly write without remuneration, and their gratis efforts suggest there's a major adjustment going on in the economics of content. Despite the attention around search specialists such as Demand Media, Associated Content and Examiner, a growing group of sites is betting on something better than cheap content: free content.

Huffington Post is, perhaps, the mother of the model now with more than 6,000 unpaid bloggers bringing in an audience of 23 million people each month, according to ComScore. Not all of Huffington's content is produced without cost, of course. The company employs around 53 editorial staffers who edit and produce original writing. (The company employs a total of 124 people.) But its overwhelming army of bloggers renders a bulk of the pages, thus lightening the cost. After five years in operation, CEO Eric Hippeau said the company will make profit this year. "We're very confident that online news can be a profitable business," he said. "Advertisers are very interested in reaching our audience -- a very high-level, educated audience."

Though such a claim may draw its detractors -- where would the site be without source material for example -- there's little question an article on Huffington outshines an article from a low-cost purveyor like Demand, which does pay its writers. The average time a reader spends on Huffington is almost 15 minutes each month, according to ComScore. By comparison, the average time on a Demand property is just under six minutes.

Christopher N. Curtin, VP-digital strategy for Hewlett-Packard, says Huffington is considered a higher-end buy among marketers. "Their audience is a pretty attractive one," he said, "and it's the content that's drawing that audience."

It also underscores an emerging but difficult truth for professional writers. Free content can just as easily draw a higher-profile readership as expensive content, as well as high-end advertisers. Wikia, Jimmy Wales' for-profit venture, also harvests page views from freely contributing members, and the company has already proclaimed its profitability. The site functions much like Wikipedia but centers on entertainment -- for example, the "Twilight" Wiki. Mr. Wales said the site will continue to be profitable this quarter. Wikia has a monthly audience of 11 million, according to ComScore, who on average spend roughly 25 minutes on the site.

Despite a widespread jingoism among media watchers favoring new forms of journalism, some observers say no-cost writing is a disquieting trend. "I wonder whether we're seeing the 'Craigslist effect,' but for content," Newsonomics author Ken Doctor said, referring to how the free-listings site has vitiated the classifieds business. "You make the cost of content creation so much cheaper, but in so doing you are ruining the economics of traditional news publishing."

Indeed, publishers have caught on to this changing tide. Bleacher Report has inked content deals with major media companies, including Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Houston Chronicle, SI.com, CBSSports.com, FoxSports.com and the ailing Philly.com, a property of the Philadelphia Inquirer, which, along with Philadelphia Daily News, was bought out of bankruptcy in April for $135 million. Bleacher publishes a page for each partner, which has the look and feel of the publisher's content but which entirely features Bleacher writers. The site splits ad revenue. An insider says Bleacher will be profitable this year. The company just appointed a new CEO, Brian Grey of Polaris Venture Partners and the former senior VP of Fox Sports Interactive.

"I'm sensitive to writers who say, 'What are you doing giving your writing away for free?'" said Mr. Brining, who after failing the bar three times decided writing was more than a hobby. He is supported by his family. "Yes, Bleacher Report is reaping the financial rewards of my work, but it's also helping me achieve my career. If I am good at this, the compensation will come."

Place BrandIndex's World Cup marketer research in NY Times, Advertising Age and Brandweek






Nike's Not a World Cup Sponsor, but It's Stealing the Show

YouGov Survey Suggests Athlete Relationships and 'Write the Future' Campaign Providing Brand Lift


CHICAGO (AdAge.com) -- Here's one more sign that Nik

e's epic "Write the Future" is fast becoming one of the most successful ambush-marketing efforts in history.

According to a YouGov BrandIndex survey of consumer perception in the U.S., U.K. and Germany, Nike has benefited from the FIFA World Cup more than any other brand despite not being an official sponsor of the event.

The footwear and apparel behemoth saw the largest uptick in positive consumer perceptions among measured brands in the

U.S. and the U.K., and it placed fourth in Germany, according to the BrandIndex survey. Nike has direct relationships with many star athletes competing in the World Cup, and it is using them in its TV and web video campaign, which appeared online three weeks before the World Cup beganThe survey asked 5,000 people daily in each country, "If you've heard anything about the brand in the last two weeks, was it positive or negative?"

In the U.S., the brands that saw the top increases in positive buzz were Nike, which is not a World Cup sponsor; ESPN and ABC, which show World Cup matches; and Sony and Adidas, which are official sponsors. In the U.K., Nike led again, followed by official sponsors Vis

a, Sony, Hyundai and Budweiser. In Germany, Coca-Cola scored the biggest increase on the strength of a highly integrated global campaign built around soccer celebrations, followed by Emirates, Adidas, Nike and Continental.

++++








Nike, Hyundai, ESPN Top World Cup 'Movers' List

June 23, 2010

Like other major sports events, th e World Cup is an opportunity for marketers to get consumers talking about their brands. That's exactly what Nike, Hyundai and ESPN have done. The three brands have received the biggest consumer perception boosts among U.S. consumers in the first week of the international soccer tournament, according to market research firm YouGov's BrandIndex report. Rounding out the list were ABC, Sony and Adidas.

The Brandweek Buzz Report by YouGov is a weekly consumer perception report that analyzes the most talked about brands based on buzz: The scores are based on weighing positive and negative perceptions of a brand. A +100 score is positive, a -100 score is negative, and a rating of zero means that the score is neutral.

YouGov interviews 5,000 people each weekday from a representative U.S. population sample. Respondents are drawn from an online panel of 1.5 million individuals.

For the World Cup "Top 5 Buzz Movers" report, YouGov focused on three countries: U.S., U.K. and Germany.





The key findings were:

• The U.S. has traditionall y lagged behind in terms of interest and support for soccer. However, the magnitude of improvement in buzz score during the first week of the tournament shows relative consistency across countries, indicating that the U.S. has been very receptive of the event, falling in line with Germany and the U.K.

• While not an official sponsor, Nike is an aggressive World Cup advertiser, having launched a campaign dubbed "Write the Future." Team sponsorship has also helped Nike's World Cup presence, since it has strong ties to the Brazilian team, one of the consensus favorites to win the tournament. Overall, the brand has been successful in improving its buzz score in each of the countries.

• When considering the net works broadcasting the World Cup games, ABC and ESPN have experienced considerable buzz boosts during the first week. The gains come at a time when regular programming is in a dark period.

++++



June 22, 2010, 4:11 pm

Marketers Have ‘Goals’ at World Cup, Too

The 2010 World Cup is the first to be played under the auspices, or maybe under the influence, of the social media. So companies that analyze data from Facebook, Twitter and other social media outlets are eagerly providing data on how advertisers — official and otherwise — are faring among soccer (or football) fans.

...Buzz for Nike is spiking in another survey, by YouGov, known as the YouGov Brand Index, which is being conducted in the United States, Britain and Germany.

The buzz for Nike rose by the most of any World Cup advertiser in Britain and the United States, according to the YouGov Brand Index, and was fourth in Germany, where Coca-Cola was the biggest “buzz mover.”

The improvements for Nike in Britain and the United States were greater than for any official sponsor, according to YouGov.


Break INVIDI patent story in Ad Age and Multichannel News




Long Quest for Addressable Ads Moves Forward

New Patents for Invidi, Company Backed by Google and Group M

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Invidi Technologies Corp. said it has been awarded a number of patents that give it the ability to license to others technology that delivers specific ads to particular households or viewers, as well as ascertains the response of the viewers who see them.

It's a sign that the long, sometimes grinding quest to deliver so-called addressable advertising is moving forward.

"Our technology is not limited to just cable television," said Bruce Andeson, chief technology officer at Invidi. "The patent is broad enough to encompass video on cellphones to regular television viewing to viewing on your computer." No matter how video is viewed in the future, he suggested, "the intellectual property would come into play."

The quest to make addressable advertising available for mass marketers has been glacial in its progress, but Invidi's patents suggest the infrastructure for a marketplace in the technology is gradually starting to form. Other entities also help marketers tweak ads for specific audiences, whether they are centered around a geographic location or age or gender demographic. But because delivering such advertising hinges on having a set-top box as the final link to the consumer, and because most cable, satellite and telecommunications video systems are built differently from one another, it has been difficult to assemble an efficient way for, say, Procter & Gamble to reach the millions of diaper consumers it needs.

Over time, said David Downey, president-CEO of Invidi, the company hopes to "target every potential view of every potential [commercial] break."

Google recently took a stake in the company, joining WPP's Group M on the roster of investors. Experian, a company that helps analyze consumer habits and purchases, also took a stake in Invidi late last month and formed a partnership under which the two will help advertisers measure the effects of television ad campaigns, among other efforts.

One adviser to the company believes the patents could prompt big TV-industry players, such as cable-service providers, to adopt Invidi's technology as part of their efforts to make addressable advertising available to marketers.

"The Comcasts of the world are so powerful, they don't really let startups flourish in their space," said Tracey Scheppach, senior VP-innovations director at Publicis Groupe's SMGX. "It seems to me the only way you can be taken seriously is to go after the patent protection." Satellite providers are already making addressable ads available in wider fashion, she added, so the big cable providers have some motivation for looking more deeply into addressable possibilities. "That's going to force the hand of the rest of the ecosystem, she said.

Invidi already licenses intellectual property to customers and partners, said Mr. Downey, and the company is "willing to consider license arrangements with other industry players under the right circumstances."

++++

Invidi Looks To License Patents For Addressable TV Ads

Firm Considers Licensing Deals For Recently Issued Patents

By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News

Invidi Technologies said it will consider engaging in licensing agreements for two recently issued U.S. patents, which, according to the company, cover key aspects of its system for delivering addressable TV advertising.

As part of Invidi's distribution deals, "we license our intellectual property to our customers and technology partners and are willing to consider license arrangements with other industry players under the right circumstances," Invidi president and CEO David Downey said in a statement.

Invidi declined to comment on whether it plans to pursue litigation to defend the patents.

The New York-based company's customers include DirecTV and Dish Network, which intend to deliver targeted ads to subscribers by delivering different spots to their DVRs. Verizon Communications also is using Invidi's system to deliver ads at a zone level.

On June 1, 2010, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted Invidi U.S. Patent No. 7,730,509, titled "Asset Delivery Reporting in a Broadcast Network." The patent covers the delivery of content that is targeted to users of a broadcast network based on signals from customer-premises equipment and selected from a collection of available asset options.

Another patent, No. 7,698,236, granted April 10, 2010, titled "Fuzzy Logic Based Viewer Identification for Targeted Asset Delivery System," covers certain "machine learning functionality" whereby data inputs from a current network user can be used to refine the selection of which targeted advertisement should be delivered to that user.

Invidi also holds Patent No. 7,546,619, granted June 9, 2009, titled "Voting and Headend Insertion Model for Targeting Content in a Broadcast Network," which covers a selection process for the delivery of targeted content based on parameters such as age, gender, income, locale and personal interest.

In addition, the company in 1996 and 1997 was granted Patent Nos. 5,515,098 and 5,661,516 (a continuation of the ‘098 patent) titled "System and Method for Selectively Distributing Commercial Messages over a Communications Network," covering household targeting and addressing advertisements to a subscriber terminal based on household data associated with the terminal.

Invidi's investors include Google, Experian, Motorola and WPP's GroupM.